Dynamic modeling fills in the gaps of steady-state modeling and provides a more complete, reliable and efficient analysis
Ali Bourji, David Ballow and Martha Choroszy WorleyParsons
One of the most energy-intensive utilities for many facilities in the chemical process industries (CPI) is the steam system. Traditionally, steam-use optimization has centered on efficient heat transfer and eliminating waste [ 1]. Further optimization can involve a broader look at how steam supply and consumption interact dynamically throughout a large complex. This type of optimization often results in increased interconnectivity and interdependency.
Many CPI facilities have a central steam-production area containing boilers and boiler feedwater treatment, as well as additional steam generators scattered throughout the facility (for example in the petroleum refining sector there are ethylene and catalytic cracking units). If a facility is built in several stages, as is often the case, steam generating systems may be separated by considerable distances. Over these distances, the stability of the integrated steam system could be jeopardized by inappropriate control strategies. How should one go about setting up a control strategy and verifying that it is stable and appropriate for a particular complex?
...
This information is only available to Gold members.
Forgot your user ID or password? Click here to have it sent to you.
Not a member yet?
UPGRADE now to full archive accces and you will receive:
A discount on full delegate pass to ChemInnovations.
Join other CPI professionals from all over the globe and share best practices, expertise, concerns and more.
Provide feedback to Chemical Engineering Editors
Current members represent Worley Parsons, DuPont, SABIC, Fluor, Air Products, LyondellBasell, Nalco, Dow Chemical, Dow Corning, BASF, Jacobs Engineering, ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron and more.
